Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
83 lines (64 loc) · 3.7 KB

MI-R1.3-75ec3968cc-EMERGENT_CATION_SPONGE.md

File metadata and controls

83 lines (64 loc) · 3.7 KB

TITLE: FAIR Maturity Indicator MI-R1.3-75ec3968cc-EMERGENT_CATION_SPONGE

Authors:

Ammar Ammar, ORCID:0000-0002-8399-8990

Publication Date: 2021-02-26

Last Edit: 2024-04-13

Accepted: pending

Maturity Indicator Identifier: MI-R1.3-75ec3968cc-EMERGENT_CATION_SPONGE

This maturity indicator falls under the FAIR principle R1.3: (meta)data meet domain-relevant community standards

The ID of this MI is composed of the following segments (separated by hyphen):

  1. Acronym for "Maturity Indicator"
  2. The FAIR principle this maturity indicator belongs to
  3. The first 10 characters truncated from the SHA-256 hash of the primary reference DOI of this maturity indicator.
  4. A short name to distinguish the maturity indicator definition file

This MI is to indicate if the presence of cationic particles with a proton sponge effect is reported by the nano toxicity study data or not.

Maturity Indicator Name: The presence of cationic particles with a proton sponge effect is reported by the nano toxicity study

This maturity indicator is extracted from the following paper Title: Where Are We Heading in Nanotechnology Environmental Health and Safety and Materials Characterization? DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b03496

To which principle does it apply?

R1.3

What is being measured?

If the presence of cationic particles with a proton sponge effect is reported by the nano toxicity study data or not.

Why should we measure it?

The presence of cationic particles with a proton sponge effect is one of the properties that, although dependent on intrinsic and extrinsic material properties, dynamically emerge at the nano-bio interface as the most proximate link to injury. These often reveals structure-activity relationships that can be used quantitatively for modeling and safer design.

What must be provided for the measurement?

If the value is measured and reported in the data, the following field(s) should appear in JSON-LD metadata:

Field Name Alternative terms
cationic particles with a proton sponge effect cationic_particles_with_a_proton_sponge_effect,
cationic-particles-with-a-proton-sponge-effect

How is the measurement executed?

The "cationic particles with a proton sponge effect" field should be provided in a machine-readable format (JSON-LD) which can be queried using open universal protocol like HTTP.

What is/are considered valid result(s)?

The presence of the field "cationic particles with a proton sponge effect" in the JSON-LD metadata means the measurement is reported which is the valid result.

For which digital resource(s) is this relevant? (or 'all')

For nano toxicity related datasets.

Examples of good practices (that would score well on this assessment)

{
 	"@context": {
 		"bs": "https://bioschemas.org/",
 		"schema": "https://schema.org/",
 		"citation": "schema:citation",
 		"name": "schema:name",
 		"url": "schema:url",
 		"variableMeasured": "schema:variableMeasured",
 		"unitText": "schema:unitText"
 	},
 	"@type": "schema:Dataset",
 	"name": "Dataset title",
 	"@id": "Dataset DOI",
 	"url": "Dataset URL",
 	"citation": "Dataset Citation/Publication",
 	"variableMeasured": [
 		{
 			"@type": "schema:PropertyValue",
 			"name": "cationic particles with a proton sponge effect"
 		}
 	]
 }

Comments